From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-81527-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26757 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2011 10:08:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 26749 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jun 2011 10:08:05 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:07:47 +0000
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p59A7cwr030527	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Thu, 9 Jun 2011 06:07:38 -0400
Received: from hase (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p59A7aLL009793;	Thu, 9 Jun 2011 06:07:37 -0400
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch, testsuite] gdb.base/savedregs.exp: SIGSEGV -> SIGILL
References: <4DF09229.4070704@codesourcery.com>
X-Yow: I have no actual hairline...
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:08:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <4DF09229.4070704@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Thu, 09	Jun 2011 17:28:09 +0800")
Message-ID: <m3wrgvb9nb.fsf@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00125.txt.bz2

Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> writes:

> In current gdb.base/savedregs.exp, signal handler is installed for
> signal SIGSEGV, and SIGSEGV is trigger by `*(char *)0 = 0;'.  However,
> on non-mmu uclinux system, writing to an address 0x0 doesn't trigger
> SIGSEGV.

Does (char*)-1 work instead?

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84  5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."