Re: [RFC] disassemble-next-line

[Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>]

>>>>> "teawater" == teawater  <teawater@gmail.com> writes:

teawater> This is the patch for the function to output assembly codes
teawater> for next line.

teawater> +/* If ON, GDB will output the assembly codes of next line.
teawater> +   If OFF, GDB will not do it.
teawater> +   doesn't support it, GDB will instead use the traditional

I think this third line should be removed.

teawater> +/* Show assembly codes; stub for catch_errors.  */
teawater> +
teawater> +struct gdb_disassembly_stub_args
teawater> +{
teawater> +  int how_many;
teawater> +  CORE_ADDR low;
teawater> +  CORE_ADDR high;
teawater> +};
teawater> +
teawater> +static int
teawater> +gdb_disassembly_stub (void *args)
teawater> +{
teawater> +  struct gdb_disassembly_stub_args *p = args;
teawater> +  gdb_disassembly (uiout, 0, 0, 0, p->how_many, p->low, p->high);
teawater> +  return 0;

IMO, in this case it would be shorter, and clearer, to use TRY_CATCH
at the call site rather than catch_errors.  What do you think?

teawater> +  /* If disassemble-next-line is set to auto or on and doesn't have
teawater> +     line message, output current instructions.  */

"a line message"

teawater> +      /* If disassemble-next-line is set to on and there is line
teawater> +         messages, output assembly codes for next line.  */

"there are line messages"

teawater> +  add_setshow_enum_cmd ("disassemble-next-line", class_run,
teawater> +			disassemble_next_line_enum,
teawater> +			&disassemble_next_line, _("\
teawater> +Set debugger's willingness to use disassemble-next-line."), _("\

This text seems circular.
Instead it should briefly describe what the option does.

teawater> +Show debugger's willingness to use disassemble-next-line."), _("\
teawater> +If on, gdb will output the assembly codes of next line.\n\

This also reads strangely, but I don't have a suggestion for what it
ought to say.  I think it should at least say when the assembly will
be displayed.  "assembly codes" in particular sounds odd to me.

teawater> +If auto (which is the default), gdb will output a assembly code\n\
teawater> +at current address if there is not line message."),

"at the current address"

The line message bit could use rewording as well; at least s/not/no/.

Tom