From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10268 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2009 22:23:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 10259 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Apr 2009 22:23:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:22:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3GMMIhS032019; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:22:18 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n3GMMHvc024435; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:22:17 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-173.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.173]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3GMMGCO027458; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:22:17 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5A73B50830B; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:22:16 -0600 (MDT) To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] print error message if (auto) disassembly failed References: <20090416173918.GP7557@adacore.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090416173918.GP7557@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Thu\, 16 Apr 2009 10\:39\:18 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00399.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> (FWIW: I did not realize that GDB would now print the current assembly Joel> instruction by default when the change came in. I don't think that's Joel> a useful default based on my own usage, but no big deal) The default is "auto", which means: If AUTO (which is the default), or there's no line info to determine the source line of the next instruction, display disassembly of next instruction instead. */ But I agree with you that this is the wrong default. I think the default should be "off". Tom