From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9665 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2009 18:49:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 9608 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jun 2009 18:49:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_34,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:48:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n59ImuoP007028 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:48:56 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n59Imt6E011529; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:48:55 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-99.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.99]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n59ImsXo023981; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:48:54 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 87160486A3; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 12:48:53 -0600 (MDT) To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit] Rename some test binaries References: <20090609171641.GA21222@caradoc.them.org> <20090609181228.GA26510@caradoc.them.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:49:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090609181228.GA26510@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Tue\, 9 Jun 2009 14\:12\:28 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00234.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Tom> I think this also needs patches to all the Makefile.in's. Tom> Unless you want to take the opportunity to get rid of this stuff... :) Daniel> Are they actually current? If they are, I'll update them... last I Daniel> remember they were very stale. I don't know. Actually I thought you were the one who got me to update some test suite patch to do this ;). But I don't really remember. I was thinking about just renaming them all to add a ".exe" suffix, to make the clean rule trivial. Maybe there's some other way to drop this stuff, though. Daniel> I was looking at the rules GCC uses today. It looks like it would be Daniel> easy to migrate, but the Make goo involved is over my head. Splitting Daniel> gdb.base in half and then parallelizing the rest at directory Daniel> granularity should do a lot of good on a modern 4-way or 8-way system. Daniel> Want to give it a shot? :-) It's been on my to-try list for months, but you know how that goes. Tom