From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16077 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2009 19:38:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 16065 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Sep 2009 19:38:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:38:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n83JcABq010641; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 15:38:10 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n83Jc95b016357; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 15:38:10 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n83Jc8hk004345; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 15:38:09 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1CFFF378242; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 13:38:08 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Use data cache for stack accesses References: <7e6c8d660907081308r13bff580rdcf4822c77df8403@mail.gmail.com> <200907082146.40513.pedro@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:38:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:38:30 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> [We can certainly pull the patch or default stack-cache to off if Doug> you like.] I don't know if that is warranted. I think it probably depends on the consequences of this code, and I haven't looked into that. Tom