From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28527 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2009 21:12:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 28518 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Sep 2009 21:12:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:12:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8BLBrHv002620; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:11:54 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8BLBrx2003500; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:11:53 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8BLBpkd002930; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:11:52 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5E348378188; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:11:51 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Patch: implement new dynamic varobj spec References: <19113.58116.381538.294631@totara.tehura.co.nz> <83hbv91a2i.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <83hbv91a2i.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:49:09 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00337.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: Nick> Existing documentation uses @var for field names, while new uses @samp. >> Yeah. @var seems clearly wrong there. >> I will change the new code though. Eli> What part of the patch does this refer to? I didn't yet read the Eli> patch carefully, but just skimming it I don't see any wrong @var. Eli> Please be more specific. He is saying that the patch has additions like: @table @samp @item name The name of the varobj. ... but existing MI documentation uses @table @var. Tom