From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19625 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2010 15:37:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 19616 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2010 15:37:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:37:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2GFbFBs001024 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:37:16 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2GFbEwM016879; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:37:15 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2GFbDxX007556; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:37:14 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9D51E378261; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:37:13 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [MI tracepoints 5/9] -break-passcount References: <201003141156.07046.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <201003161513.30609.vladimir@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201003161513.30609.vladimir@codesourcery.com> (Vladimir Prus's message of "Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:13:30 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00586.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Volodya" == Vladimir Prus writes: Tom> Doesn't the use of get_tracepoint make it tracepoint-specific? Tom> Or is this changed somewhere in the patch series? Volodya> I was confused. This command remains specific to tracepoint, there's Volodya> no patch (yet?) that merges -break-passcount and -break-after and Volodya> in fact, it's probably not a good idea. In that case, shouldn't the new command be called -trace-passcount, not -break-passcount? Tom