From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8586 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2011 19:05:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 8575 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2011 19:05:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:04:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6JJ4iAN027284 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:04:44 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6JJ4isw009531; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:04:44 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6JJ4gaS009552; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:04:43 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: "Philippe Waroquiers" Cc: Subject: Re: allow to set length of hw watchpoints (e.g. for Valgrind gdbserver) References: Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:13:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Philippe Waroquiers's message of "Thu, 7 Jul 2011 03:26:33 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00492.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Philippe" == Philippe Waroquiers writes: Philippe> Updated patch to a recent cvs version + undone the changes Philippe> related to fixing bug in x86/amd64 hardware registers, as Philippe> Pedro Alves was doing a better fix (see Philippe> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-06/msg00002.html , Philippe> not yet comitted). Thanks for doing this. Philippe> For the copyright assignment: I just received today the news Philippe> that the signed papers arrived back at FSF, and will be Philippe> processed tomorrow. The code bits are ok; the docs have to be reviewed separately. BTW, your mailer mangled the patch. Tom