From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20806 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2011 16:21:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 20739 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Nov 2011 16:21:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:20:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAEGKddL016899 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:20:39 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAEGKc9o021531; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:20:39 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAEGKaYM018129; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:20:37 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Werner Almesberger , Jon Beniston Subject: Re: [PATCH] 32 bit-ism in lm32-tdep.c (and some sloppy macros) References: <20111111233808.GA10815@ws> <201111141612.17372.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:21:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201111141612.17372.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:12:16 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00357.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> On Monday 14 November 2011 15:48:48, Tom Tromey wrote: >> I was a little surprised to find out we already use int16_t in gdb. Pedro> We pull stdint.h from gnulib. I was meaning to ask ... do we have a gnulib update policy? I wanted to pull in stdbool.h and start using bool in gdb; plus maybe some other bits so we can use O_CLOEXEC and friends (but only maybe -- it isn't clear to me that gnulib is the best way to tackle this problem). Anyway, then I noticed that the existing files are not up-to-date against gnulib git. It seemed to me that updating now, just before a release, was maybe not the best time. Any thoughts? Tom