From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18015 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2011 19:27:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 18007 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Nov 2011 19:27:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:27:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAUJRJMQ014931 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:27:20 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAUJRJEG025911; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:27:19 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAUJRFIx003814; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:27:16 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC/WIP PATCH 11/14] Add I/T set support to most execution commands References: <20111128153742.17761.21459.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <20111128153953.17761.62637.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:27:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20111128153953.17761.62637.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> (Pedro Alves's message of "Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:39:53 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00854.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> This adds I/T set support to most execution commands. Very nice. Pedro> Lastly, all these switches are currently implemented in the Pedro> following commands: Pedro> step, next, stepi, nexti, continue, until, jump, signal, finish Pedro> and interrupt. I thought there was a PR open about "continue -a" not working when there are multiple inferiors, but I couldn't find it just now. Anyway I guess this series would fix it. Pedro> - make sure that we're not regressing against a target that doesn't Pedro> support non-stop/async. I haven't tried that yet. A user on irc specifically asked about making sure that this doesn't regress Windows. Tom