From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19088 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2012 03:45:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 19068 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2012 03:45:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 03:45:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA33jb5P025619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 2 Nov 2012 23:45:37 -0400 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-109.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.109]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA33jYkE024448; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 23:45:35 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Binutils Development Subject: Re: RFC: implement 'info proc mappings' for core files References: <87y5ijoniv.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 03:45:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87y5ijoniv.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:41:44 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 On Friday, November 02 2012, Tom Tromey wrote: > I'm CCing the binutils list because this patch, like my previous one, > needs a small addition to elfcore_grok_note, this time to make the > NT_FILE note's data available to gdb. > > This patch implements "info proc mappings" and "info proc exe" for core > files. It also changes gdb to write the NT_FILE note from "gcore". Wow, I totally forgot about this feature. In fact, I thought Ulrich's patch had already implemented it! If I knew it hadn't been implemented, I would have sent my patches again :-). Shame on me. Anyway, thanks for implementing this! -- Sergio