From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29139 invoked by alias); 16 May 2013 05:53:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29129 invoked by uid 89); 16 May 2013 05:53:59 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 May 2013 05:53:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4G5rurC008798 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 16 May 2013 01:53:57 -0400 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-83.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.83]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4G5rrJu002183 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 16 May 2013 01:53:55 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Keith Seitz , "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org ml" Subject: Re: [RFA] completer test [was Re: [RFC] Cleanup for make_source_files_completion_list] References: <51895A2F.8000504@redhat.com> <5191340B.60100@redhat.com> <519156F5.5090000@redhat.com> <5193C786.4000207@redhat.com> <5193E2DC.5000200@redhat.com> <51941E85.8010104@redhat.com> <20130516053008.GA5555@adacore.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 05:53:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130516053008.GA5555@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Thu, 16 May 2013 09:30:09 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00569.txt.bz2 On Thursday, May 16 2013, Joel Brobecker wrote: > I haven't verified yet that the issue you fixed is the same as > the issue I noticed, and put aside for later. But my initial > investigation at the time showed that the problem did not appear > when using the "complete" command, only when using the interactive > form via the "tab" key. That's interesting, I really thought the "complete" command would have the exact same effect as the interactive form. Living and learning. -- Sergio