From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18145 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2003 20:13:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18038 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2003 20:13:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO yosemite.airs.com) (209.128.65.135) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2003 20:13:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 3322 invoked by uid 10); 14 Nov 2003 20:13:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 6281 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2003 20:01:26 -0000 From: Ian Lance Taylor To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, rearnsha@arm.com Subject: Re: Building cross-gdb to arm-netbsd References: <20031114172552.3905.qmail@gossamer.airs.com> <200311141858.hAEIwHig000364@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:13:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200311141858.hAEIwHig000364@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00304.txt.bz2 Mark Kettenis writes: > In any case, this patch fixes the build problem. > > 2003-11-14 Ian Lance Taylor > > * config/arm/nbsd.mt (TM_FILE): Define. > * config/arm/tm-nbsd.h: New file. > > Your config/arm/tm-nbsd.h also includes "arm/tm-arm.h". Is that > necessary? To be honest, I don't know. I did it by analogy with i386/tm-nbsd.h. I suppose, looking at it more closely, then the definition of VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK is not needed, since the system compiler is always gcc. So the only thing which arm/tm-arm.h does is define GDB_MULTI_ARCH. Looking at defs.h, that may also be unnecessary. So I guess it is not needed. gdb does build without that #include. Ian