From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15549 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2007 15:23:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 15347 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jul 2007 15:23:21 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:23:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 15498 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2007 15:23:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (jimb@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 12 Jul 2007 15:23:14 -0000 To: Nick Clifton Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Update to splay-tree.h for 64-bit Windows host References: From: Jim Blandy Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Nick Clifton's message of "Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:21:33 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg00196.txt.bz2 Nick Clifton writes: > I have checked in the patch below as part of a wider patch to allow > the binutils to be built on a 64-bit windows host. It provides a > 64-bit windows alternative for the type of the splay_tree_key and > splay_tree_value types. Out of curiosity --- what would it cost to make splay tree keys always 64 bits long? I needed a splay tree indexed by 64-bit addresses for GDB; I made it go, but it was a pain.