From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13048 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2010 17:34:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 13039 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Feb 2010 17:34:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:34:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o14HY2A6027544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:34:02 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o14HY1uT022370; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:34:01 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o14HY0Mw001001; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:34:00 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id E37D137996D; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:33:59 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: GDB Subject: Re: PATCH: PR tui/9622: tui over-eagerly initializes readline References: <20100204170700.GA12550@lucon.org> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20100204170700.GA12550@lucon.org> (H. J. Lu's message of "Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:07:00 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00123.txt.bz2 >>>>> "HJ" == H J Lu writes: HJ> We shouldn't initialize readline if gdb_stdout isn't a tty. OK HJ> to install? I wrote a different patch a long time ago for this bug. Mine checks if input is from a terminal... I think yours is reasonable though. This is ok. Tom