From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17715 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2010 21:47:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 17690 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Feb 2010 21:47:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:47:16 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1BLlEXX000373 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:47:14 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1BLlEWn030890; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:47:14 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1BLlDMf007734; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:47:13 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id D768A378261; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:47:12 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Sanity check PIE displacement (like the PIC one) References: <20100201012004.GA6015@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100211200506.GA24110@caradoc.them.org> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:47:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20100211200506.GA24110@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:05:11 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00304.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Jan> warning: .dynamic section for "/lib64/librt-2.11.1.so" is not at the expected address Jan> warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations Tom> I don't find that PIC message particularly useful, either. Tom> Is there some situation where that information is helpful? Tom> If not, then IMO we should remove it. Daniel> Under what circumstances would you remove it? I'd favor Daniel> removing the former warning when the second one would be Daniel> printed, but not otherwise. Ok. Daniel> The first message is a real life-saver. It triggers when you Daniel> have the wrong C library when loading a core file or using a Daniel> sysroot. Thanks, I had not considered this scenario. Tom