From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-78264-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 9337 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2011 18:34:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 9323 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2011 18:33:59 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:33:55 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1FIXkT3017704	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:33:46 -0500
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1FIXk7v012982;	Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:33:46 -0500
Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1FIXjc0003367;	Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:33:45 -0500
Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500)	id EF50B378C97; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:33:44 -0700 (MST)
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [unavailable values part 1, 03/17] expose list of available ranges to common code
References: <201102071429.19096.pedro@codesourcery.com>	<20110214115939.GC2454@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net>	<201102141939.10946.pedro@codesourcery.com>	<20110214211223.GA9425@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:42:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20110214211223.GA9425@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (Jan	Kratochvil's message of "Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:12:23 +0100")
Message-ID: <m3tyg587w7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00331.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

Jan> Still in which case an inferior object size does not fit in CORE_ADDR?
Jan> I do not think it can happen, CORE_ADDR should be OK for inferior size_t.

We can just make a CORE_SIZE_T and use it.
Then we have some freedom later if we need to typedef it differently.

Tom