From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10622 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2011 14:45:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 10611 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jun 2011 14:45:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:45:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5GEjO7g002997 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:45:25 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5GEjOHv031834; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:45:24 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5GEjNrk003752; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:45:24 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 3F40A378253; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:45:22 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfa, doc] Remove warning about "unstable" Target Descriptions format References: <201106160915.p5G9FchO026070@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:45:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201106160915.p5G9FchO026070@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (Ulrich Weigand's message of "Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:15:38 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00231.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Ulrich" == Ulrich Weigand writes: Ulrich> The patch below removes the warning from the doc. Ulrich> Any comments? I think it seems like a good idea to remove this. Tom