From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-85222-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7674 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2011 18:05:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 7632 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2011 18:05:31 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:04:57 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAFI4tga017598	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:04:56 -0500
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAFI4t2I016680;	Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:04:55 -0500
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAFI4seJ013508;	Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:04:54 -0500
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFA: documentation change for ambiguous linespec patch
References: <m3mxbypfq1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83fwhpe36s.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:05:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <83fwhpe36s.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 15 Nov	2011 18:54:51 +0200")
Message-ID: <m3ty65l0sa.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00399.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

Eli> How about "...will now be set on all matching locations..."?  "Have
Eli> locations" sounds a bit confusing; at least I never thought of a
Eli> breakpoint as _having_ a location.

Ok, I did that.

>> +                   locations will be added or subtracted according to
>> +  inferior changes.

Eli> Will these additions and removals be announced by GDB?

Nope.

Eli> Also, is "subtracted" the right word here?  I use it only as an
Eli> arithmetic operation, but I'm not a native speaker.

I changed it to "added".

Tom