Re: [PATCH 05/14] change how the CLI handles comments

[Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>]

Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com> writes:

> On 19/05/14 00:26, Doug Evans wrote:
>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/gdb/top.c b/gdb/top.c
>>> index fa20025..16694e6 100644
>>> --- a/gdb/top.c
>>> +++ b/gdb/top.c
>>> @@ -560,11 +560,14 @@ command_loop (void)
>>>
>>>        make_command_stats_cleanup (1);
>>>
>>> -      execute_command (command, instream == stdin);
>>> -
>>> -      /* Do any commands attached to breakpoint we are stopped at.  */
>>> -      bpstat_do_actions ();
>>> +      /* Do not execute commented lines.  */
>>> +      if (command[0] != '#')
>>> +       {
>>> +         execute_command (command, instream == stdin);
>>>
>>> +         /* Do any commands attached to breakpoint we are stopped at.  */
>>> +         bpstat_do_actions ();
>>> +       }
>>>        do_cleanups (old_chain);
>>>      }
>>>  }
>>> @@ -1057,15 +1060,6 @@ command_line_input (char *prompt_arg, int repeat, char *annotation_suffix)
>>>    if (*linebuffer && input_from_terminal_p ())
>>>      add_history (linebuffer);
>>>
>>> -  /* Note: lines consisting solely of comments are added to the command
>>> -     history.  This is useful when you type a command, and then
>>> -     realize you don't want to execute it quite yet.  You can comment
>>> -     out the command and then later fetch it from the value history
>>> -     and remove the '#'.  The kill ring is probably better, but some
>>> -     people are in the habit of commenting things out.  */
>>> -  if (*p1 == '#')
>>> -    *p1 = '\0';                        /* Found a comment.  */
>>> -
>>>    /* Save into global buffer if appropriate.  */
>>>    if (repeat)
>>>      {
>>> --
>>> 1.9.0
>>>
>>
>> Hi.  I have an equivalent patch that I need for guile support.
>> E.g.,
>> guile
>> (foo
>>   #:bar 42)
>> end
>>
>> Since this is really independent of the rest of the patch set,
>> can this be checked in right away?
>> TIA
>
> I have no problems with you checking this patch in as long as nobody
> else objects.  Lets give it a day or so for people to speak up.
> Pending that I would say go ahead.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil

Hi.

I have committed this.
Thanks.