From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29574 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2009 00:57:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 29540 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jul 2009 00:57:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:57:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6T0vOjI012830; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:57:24 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6T0vNTk003343; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:57:24 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6T0vM6C000319; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:57:22 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id F04A75081C4; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:57:21 -0600 (MDT) To: Samuel Bronson Cc: Ralf Wildenhues , gcc-patches@gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Update rebuild rules in non-automake directories. References: <20090628183334.GA5401@gmx.de> <20090728181748.GA3134@gmx.de> <87skggqwep.wl%naesten@gmail.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:31:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87skggqwep.wl%naesten@gmail.com> (Samuel Bronson's message of "Tue\, 28 Jul 2009 18\:23\:42 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00705.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Samuel" == Samuel Bronson writes: >> Tom Tromey wrote: >> It seems a little odd to have a rule to rebuild aclocal.m4 when there is >> no rule to rebuild configure. Are you planning to add that? (I don't >> think this affects whether the patch is ok -- it is still an improvement >> over the present situation.) Samuel> You mean --enable-maintainer-mode doesn't already do that? I thought it did, but I couldn't find the code in gdb/Makefile.in. It does for automake-managed directories, of course. Tom