From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 622 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2009 01:12:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 612 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Dec 2009 01:12:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:12:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB41CS2A016276 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:12:28 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB41CSRa012727; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:12:28 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB41CQrB018552; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:12:27 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 7966637815E; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:12:26 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/commit] use libiconv.a instead of -liconv for in-tree libiconv References: <20091203225852.GG2877@adacore.com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20091203225852.GG2877@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:58:52 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> Trivia: libiconv on Tru64 5.1 does not handle encoding ISO-8859-1. That sounds very strange, because I would expect libiconv to always have this built in. Or do you mean that the native iconv doesn't handle this? Joel> I will monitor AdaCore's nightly builds on all our platforms Joel> for unexpected issues, but I thought I'd put this change out for Joel> review early, in case there are any suggestions. It seems reasonable to me. Tom