From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10623 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2010 17:17:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 10612 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Apr 2010 17:17:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:17:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o39HGxJq016683 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:17:00 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o39HGx81014336; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:16:59 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o39HGwTN031736; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:16:58 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0937A379786; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:16:58 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Jan Kratochvil Subject: Re: [patch] Fix dangling displays in separate debug References: <20100403095558.GA22520@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100409153014.GA10379@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201004091634.01221.pedro@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201004091634.01221.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 9 Apr 2010 16:34:01 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00265.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Jan> Unaware how to improve it more. Pedro> Would using objfile_separate_debug_iterate be better? Actually, I was wondering if we now claim to support multiple levels of separate debuginfo. Based on how it is written, objfile_separate_debug_iterate seems to indicate that we do, though comments in objfiles.h continue to claim that we do not. If we do then I agree, a simple test is insufficient. Tom