From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-79776-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 13881 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2011 09:37:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 13873 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2011 09:37:55 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:37:47 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2H9bkqG018703	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 05:37:46 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2H9bj6k027948;	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 05:37:45 -0400
From: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [python] [patch] Add is_valid to several classes
References: <m3sjun9hp7.fsf@redhat.com> <m3ipvj3tkq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Reply-to: pmuldoon@redhat.com
X-URL: http://www.redhat.com
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:19:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <m3ipvj3tkq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Wed,	16 Mar 2011 10:42:45 -0600")
Message-ID: <m3sjumrst3.fsf@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00889.txt.bz2

Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:

> Then you don't need the new macros, either.
>
> The rest looks good to me.
>
> Tom

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> 
>> So how about this wording:
>>    This method is also made available to the Python iterator object that @code{gdb.Block} provides in iteration context and via the Python @code{iter} built-in function.
>
> This is fine, thanks.

Committed with all requested changes.  Thanks.

Cheers

Phil