From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15465 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2011 20:38:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 15404 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Mar 2011 20:38:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:38:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2LKcHh2014497 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:38:17 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2LKcGdD008916; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:38:16 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2LKcFmX025303; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:38:15 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 378A6378491; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:38:15 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] DWARF-3+ DW_AT_accessibility defaults #2 (GCC PR debug/45124) References: <20110321154428.GA3761@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110321201005.GA922@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:41:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110321201005.GA922@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:10:05 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00975.txt.bz2 Tom> I am not really a fan of producer checks, but I couldn't think of Tom> anything better. Jan> I was curious I haven't found any GCC/G++ DW_AT_producer check so far. There are some but they are elsewhere -- see record_producer and then users of the field that it sets. Well, ok, I actually just found one, in arm-tdep.c. Tom