From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12908 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2011 17:08:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 12896 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Dec 2011 17:08:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:07:53 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pB2H7dbC026248 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 2 Dec 2011 12:07:39 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pB2H7dFV016234; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 12:07:39 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB2H7b0v021990; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 12:07:38 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Andrey Smirnov Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/348] Fix -Wsahdow warnings References: <201111231640.pANGefc4031803@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <201111231820.40486.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201111232023.pANKNcLf022983@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20111124220057.GU13809@adacore.com> <20111125142615.GV13809@adacore.com> Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:08:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Andrey Smirnov's message of "Thu, 1 Dec 2011 10:15:33 +0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Andrey" =3D=3D Andrey Smirnov writes: >> If the configury part is set up properly, then this warning will simply >> auto-enable for people when they upgrade GCC. =C2=A0So, it isn't like we= 'll >> just forget about it; more like at some point we'll all be joining in :) Andrey> I wish this world would have less small, city-local companies, doing Andrey> embedded development whose version of GCC is fixed in stone because Andrey> the whole building system is so obscure to anyone that no one dares= to Andrey> introduce any changes to it, and usually no one even cares. I used = to Andrey> work in such a place, so I know that some people will be left behin= d. Andrey> :-) Yeah, but due to the configure check, this warning won't be enabled for them. Maybe it would be a problem if they submitted a patch, but I don't think it is really worth worrying about. Tom