From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6850 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2008 17:46:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 6842 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Oct 2008 17:46:59 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:46:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m91HiJrF019473; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:44:19 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m91HiIqT029577; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:44:18 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-10-132.bos.redhat.com [10.16.10.132]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m91HiHmm003956; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:44:18 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4EAC688803A; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:42:55 -0600 (MDT) To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: PR 2484: completion of macro names References: <200809282301.17191.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200809301753.49962.pedro@codesourcery.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-Attribution: Tom Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200809301753.49962.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Tue\, 30 Sep 2008 17\:53\:49 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 Pedro> Fortran allows macro expansion now. I did not change this, because it Pedro> also requires changes to the Fortran lexer in gdb. I think that is Pedro> outside the scope of this patch. Perhaps a Fortran maintainer could Pedro> implement it. Pedro> Certainly. Thanks for the clarifications. Oh, btw -- I filed a PR about preprocessing and fortran a while ago, I think when I wrote the patch. It is PR 2504. Tom