From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31629 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2008 17:02:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 31258 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Dec 2008 17:02:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:02:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBCH09kd024266; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:00:09 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mBCH08Nh028850; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:00:08 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-14-12.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.12]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBCH07TU002201; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:00:08 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id D2A14378611; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:00:01 -0700 (MST) To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: fix macro expansion bug References: <200812112304.39302.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200812112350.41037.pedro@codesourcery.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:02:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200812112350.41037.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Thu\, 11 Dec 2008 23\:50\:40 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: [ macro define's extra space ] >> As with the previous, I'm sending this through the regression tester, >> but I don't expect problems. Ok if it passes? Pedro> Looks obvious enough. Ok if it passes. Committed. Tom