From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13437 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2009 17:41:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 13424 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Oct 2009 17:41:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:41:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9EHf4ZO025508; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:41:04 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9EHf3S9011866; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:41:03 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9EHf2JN004678; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:41:02 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id CF4DD37828F; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:41:01 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: [v8] multi-executable support References: <200910051659.20885.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200910141615.57994.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200910141748.28719.pedro@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:41:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200910141748.28719.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:48:28 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00306.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> Thanks, had seen that. I had noticed that gdb_locale.h doesn't wrap Pedro> ngettext, and GDB doesn't use it anywhere, so I just perhaps wrongly Pedro> assumed that ngettext would be missing on some non-GNU gettext Pedro> implementations. Yeah, I don't know about non-GNU implementations. Is there any reason not to simply always use the GNU one? I really don't know any more. Tom