From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5306 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2010 15:11:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 5293 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Nov 2010 15:11:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:11:19 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAIFB2Aj019343 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:11:02 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oAIFB1Gk027802; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:11:01 -0500 From: Phil Muldoon To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: 7.2.1 Patch inclusion (PR mi/11407) References: <20101112212237.GA2357@adacore.com> Reply-to: pmuldoon@redhat.com X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:11:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20101112212237.GA2357@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:22:37 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00234.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker writes: >> Phil> I'd like to request that the authorization for this patch: >> Phil> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-09/msg00182.html >> >> Phil> Be included in the 7.2.1 release. >> >> Phil> What do you think? >> >> It seems like a good idea to me. > > I was hoping Tom would be able to provide his feedback :-). > Please go ahead, GMs have broad authority to approve patches > for the branch. So committed, thanks. Cheers, Phil