From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15273 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2011 15:06:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 15265 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Feb 2011 15:06:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:06:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p17F6C9a008110 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:06:12 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p17F6BLQ017910; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:06:11 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p17F6AXI016756; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:06:10 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 61C54378334; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:06:10 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: Centralize and enhance val_print interface description comments References: <201102071110.39526.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201102071110.39526.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Mon, 7 Feb 2011 11:10:39 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00152.txt.bz2 Tom> Or maybe nuke them all and have a single comment describing the Tom> "val_print protocol" somewhere. These duplicated comments always end up Tom> rotting. Pedro> Indeed. Here's a start. Does this look clearer? Yes, definitely. Thanks for doing this. Tom