From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7533 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2011 18:46:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 7524 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2011 18:46:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_BJ,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:46:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5EIjgV7008436 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:45:42 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5EIjf2q007844; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:45:42 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5EIjf3s030972; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:45:41 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id D1540378233; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:45:40 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: FYI: make current_objfile local to symbol readers References: <201106141752.p5EHqZix005374@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20110614180056.GA5930@adacore.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110614180056.GA5930@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:00:56 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00195.txt.bz2 Mark> But isn't it a bad idea to have multiple static variables with the Mark> same name? It makes inspecting the variable with GDB a bit more Mark> difficult... Joel> That's true. It's easy to fix though: We can rename them to Joel> coff_current_objfile, or current_coff_objfile, etc. No problem, I will rename them. Tom