From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1572 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2011 17:35:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 1525 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2011 17:35:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:35:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5THZKon019162 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:35:20 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5THZKna009118; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:35:20 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5THZIBt009682; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:35:18 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: "H.J. Lu" , GDB Subject: Re: PATCH: PR testsuite/12040: GDB Fortran tests use g77 instead of gfortran References: <20100920135856.GA27953@intel.com> <20110629161001.GB2407@adacore.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:35:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110629161001.GB2407@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:10:01 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00462.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: HJ> PR testsuite/12040 HJ> * lib/ada.exp (gdb_find_gfortran): New. HJ> (gdb_default_target_compile): Use it. Joel> I wonder if we could get rid of some of this ada.exp, since IIRC, Joel> this file was created to work around a then-limitation in dejagnu Joel> where Ada wasn't supported. Joel> I will put that in my list. It is definitely in upstream dejagnu. But, I added a new bit to this code that isn't (yet -- submitted yesterday) upstream. So it must remain for a while yet. Tom