From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5476 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2011 20:38:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 5468 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Aug 2011 20:38:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:37:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p71KbwSl016826 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:37:58 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p71KbwKG019906; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:37:58 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p71Kbvts031406; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:37:57 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Keith Seitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] c++/12266 (again) References: <4E31EE1A.5040204@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:38:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4E31EE1A.5040204@redhat.com> (Keith Seitz's message of "Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:17:46 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz writes: Keith> 1) cp_demangled_name_parse_free.patch Keith> This patch simply massages cp_string_to_comp to be redundant. It is Keith> almost exactly the same as in my previous submissions. This patch is Keith> mechanical and may be applied independently of the other patch. This one is ok (still reading the other). Tom