From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20276 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2011 15:10:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 20267 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Aug 2011 15:10:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:10:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p75FA3oA009310 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:10:03 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p75FA3T1028812; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:10:03 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p75FA1Z1029628; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:10:02 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Don't disable the current display in throw_exception References: <201108051553.02017.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:10:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201108051553.02017.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:53:01 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00114.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> An unavailable exception is thrown while evaluating Pedro> the dwarf location of argc, but that is caught by higher Pedro> layers, and shouldn't cause a disablement of the display. Pedro> Patch below fixes it, and adds a test that would Pedro> fail otherwise, for me at least, on amd64-linux. Thanks for doing this. Tom