From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14019 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2011 15:51:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 13997 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Oct 2011 15:51:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:51:09 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9LFp89w000932 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:51:08 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9LFp72t026238; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:51:07 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9LFp6nM003376; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:51:06 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Paul Koning Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Python: fetch value when building gdb.Value object References: <36B29E9D-F2B3-446F-AF8A-97254A3AAEE2@comcast.net> <21467A42-84A3-4DFD-83A9-28FFFB0A5C7F@comcast.net> <2F165381-183F-471F-8F55-457F08E6B008@comcast.net> <92D17899-A614-4333-87BE-E9746DFB8AB8@comcast.net> <8C455B6B-CD9C-406C-AB5E-7CE34FA3C836@comcast.net> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:13:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <8C455B6B-CD9C-406C-AB5E-7CE34FA3C836@comcast.net> (Paul Koning's message of "Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:44:41 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00596.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Koning writes: Paul> I can make that part of the change. Paul> How about an attribute "is_lazy", which reads as True or False, and Paul> can be set to False (but not to other values)? I think for un-lazying it would be better to have an explicit method. Setting an attribute to False and then having a side-effect seems too obscure to me. Tom