From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23847 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2012 16:58:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 23835 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2012 16:58:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:58:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3KGwHIF030534 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:58:17 -0400 Received: from psique (ovpn-112-22.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.22]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3KGwCMw027454; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:58:14 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Tom Tromey Cc: Yao Qi , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move VEC (const_char_ptr) to gdb_vecs.h References: <4F9106E8.8040208@codesourcery.com> <87ty0ejvy5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:05:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87ty0ejvy5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:53:54 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00692.txt.bz2 On Friday, April 20 2012, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi writes: > > Yao> On 04/20/2012 12:23 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >>> This patch moves the definition of VEC (const_char_ptr) to gdb_vecs.h. >>> It is rather obvious, but I decided to ask either way. Ok to apply? > > Yao> It is right to me, but I am not the people to approve it. IIRC, > Yao> gdb_vecs.h is created to put several DEF_VEC_P in it. > > Yeah. > > The patch is ok. Thanks, committed. http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-04/msg00165.html -- Sergio