From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6864 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2013 03:37:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 6844 invoked by uid 89); 20 Dec 2013 03:37:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 03:37:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBK3bL4h020591 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 22:37:21 -0500 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-148.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.148]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rBK3bIGb002062 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 22:37:20 -0500 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 7.7 branching on Monday? References: <20131219175908.GH3493@adacore.com> <20131220032812.GJ3493@adacore.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 03:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20131220032812.GJ3493@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Fri, 20 Dec 2013 07:28:12 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00816.txt.bz2 On Friday, December 20 2013, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> Now, I am sorry for not having updated the wiki! I would really like to >> see the SystemTap SDT probe support for AArch64 in. It is a simple >> patch, has been pre-reviewed before, but I had to do other improvements >> on the general SDT API before submitting it again. > > No, thank you for letting me know. This answer is the reason why > it's important for me to send these "heads up" messages. Thanks a lot for that, again! >> The new API has been approved in: >> >> >> >> I was waiting for Mark Kettenis' comments on it, but I decided to check >> the patch in today and proceed with the AArch64 submission. >> >> Now, what do you want me to do? Maybe update the wiki? I hope that the >> AArch64 patch will be approved very quickly, so maybe I'll even be able >> to push it this weekend. > > I will venture a guess that you'll be able to get this one push > by Monday, but even if you don't, I think it'll be sufficiently > contained that we can backport it to the branch. Yeah, nice, I believe things will be covered until Monday, indeed. > In the meantime, let's add the patch to the wiki, if only for > posterity :). Great, I've added an entry below the Todo: section. Thanks! -- Sergio