Re: Move the multi-forks support to the generic multi-inferiors support.

Pedro Alves
2009-06-06T16:06:38Z

On Saturday 06 June 2009 01:07:29, Tom Tromey wrote:

> How about this? It adds the column headings and prints something when
> there are no inferiors.

This is fine with me, thanks, but,

are you planning on doing something similar to "info threads" output?
IMO, both these commands should be consistent. In that case, you
may have an issue with MI, as it calls print_thread_info --- I don't
know if using a table instead of a list changes MI output.

(I was a bit surprised to (re-)find that MI doesn't use
print_inferior)

--
Pedro Alves