From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30529 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2009 15:58:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 30521 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jun 2009 15:58:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:58:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n51FuZLX030125; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:56:35 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n51FuY0E008327; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:56:34 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-133.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.133]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n51FuXLA001402; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:56:33 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id C731E3784E9; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 09:56:32 -0600 (MDT) To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Move the multi-forks support to the generic multi-inferiors support. References: <200905310013.38916.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200905312308.04692.pedro@codesourcery.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:58:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200905312308.04692.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Sun\, 31 May 2009 23\:08\:04 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Tom> I guess "info inferiors" would show all the checkpointed forks for a Tom> given inferior? Pedro> That's one option, sure. I haven't given much attention to user Pedro> interface details of checkpoints. Another idea we be to just flag that Pedro> there are checkpoints available, and then the user can do the usual Pedro> "info checkpoints" to see them. I completely forgot about 'info checkpoints'. So, ignore all that, sorry. Tom> BTW, I think the "info inferiors" output still needs cleaning up, a la Tom> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00666.html Pedro> If you look at head's "info inferiors" output, it's not about cleaning Pedro> up, it's about cooking something. :-) Actually I hadn't looked at the code, I just tried it and saw that there were still no column headings. I'll try to update that old patch soon. Pedro> [...] please consider that branch closed, as it had serious Pedro> limitations and design "problems") Thanks for the heads up. Tom