From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7585 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2009 18:57:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 7575 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jul 2009 18:57:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:57:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6FIv5NZ013700; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:57:05 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6FIv4po031544; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:57:04 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6FIv2Sb010511; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:57:03 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 277DC3782F7; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:57:02 -0600 (MDT) To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] comdat types References: <20090620000402.C37E5843F5@localhost> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:28:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Tue\, 14 Jul 2009 16\:29\:34 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00398.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> How about this? Doug> It addresses the issues raised here: Doug> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-06/msg00689.html Now that you are a global maintainer (congratulations!) I think you ought to self-approve it. There has been plenty of time for comments. BTW, what is the status of the GCC patch? Tom