From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10148 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2011 18:10:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 10137 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2011 18:10:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:10:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1SIAZhV005117 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:10:35 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1SIAYBU026004; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:10:34 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1SIAY8q013425; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:10:34 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 901D13784EE; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:10:33 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Mark Kettenis Cc: yao@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Move common macros to i386-common.h References: <4D57AB12.1050708@codesourcery.com> <4D649A89.6040909@codesourcery.com> <201102232117.p1NLHdhA015543@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201102232117.p1NLHdhA015543@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (Mark Kettenis's message of "Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:17:39 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00921.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Kettenis writes: Mark> I'm particularly worried about changes I'll make myself. My primary Mark> development platform is OpenBSD which isn't supported by gdbserver. Mark> So I won't be building the gdbserver code, so I won't notice any Mark> problems my diffs (and other people's diffs) will introduce in Mark> gdbserver. I agree this is a potential problem, but it does not worry me very much. First, I think that we already just make a best effort not to break GDB on hosts that do not have active GDB developers. Second, for active hosts, breakage is noticed and fixed quickly. Third, we're looking at setting up a buildbot for GDB. See: http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/BuildBot We're still discussing the various options, but one idea is to host it on the GCC Compile Farm, plus let people host their own buildslaves. Tom