From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28097 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2011 15:08:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 28088 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jun 2011 15:08:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:07:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5MF7jWP011946 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:07:45 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5MF7iQx000640; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:07:45 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5MF7hRc004648; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:07:43 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Yao Qi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] Call init_wait_for_inferior before get_offsets References: <4DFED6B3.2050700@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:08:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4DFED6B3.2050700@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:12:19 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00302.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi writes: Yao> 2011-06-20 Yao Qi Yao> * infrun.c (start_remote): Move call init_wait_for_inferior to ... Yao> * remote.c (remote_start_remote): ... here. I don't know anything about this code, but I did notice that start_remote is also called from monitor.c. So it seems like this either needs some justification or another change. Tom