From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13439 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2011 21:04:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 13426 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jul 2011 21:03:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:03:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6PL3Z8j028593 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:03:36 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6PL3ZUv026276; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:03:35 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6PL3YUw007916; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:03:34 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Sterling Augustine Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [Patch] More responsive QUITs References: Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:41:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Sterling Augustine's message of "Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:58:19 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00712.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Sterling" == Sterling Augustine writes: Sterling> The calling function (completer.c:308 and below) doesn't free the Sterling> individual elements either, so there is a more general gdb leak. I'll Sterling> fix both. I think location_completer is moving the items from one list to another, then relying on the caller to eventually free them. This makes me wonder whether the callers of make_file_symbol_completion_list also need cleanups though. Tom