From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15425 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2011 18:24:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 15415 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2011 18:24:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:24:09 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAFIO8vj021686 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:24:08 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAFIO72b014104; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:24:07 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAFIO5oQ017023; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:24:05 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: documentation change for ambiguous linespec patch References: <83fwhpe36s.fsf@gnu.org> <837h31dzgn.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:24:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <837h31dzgn.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:15:20 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00401.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Tom Tromey >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:04:53 -0700 >> >> >> + locations will be added or subtracted according to >> >> + inferior changes. >> Eli> Also, is "subtracted" the right word here? I use it only as an Eli> arithmetic operation, but I'm not a native speaker. >> >> I changed it to "added". Eli> You mean "removed", right? Because "added" was already there. Yeah, oops. Tom