From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19788 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2014 20:00:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19778 invoked by uid 89); 24 Mar 2014 19:59:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:59:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s2OJxqoD026487 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:59:53 -0400 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-73.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.73]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s2OJxnNx004449 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:59:51 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Aleksandar Ristovski Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] Move utility functions to common/ References: <20140319223004.14668.20989.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20140319223014.14668.89536.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20140319223014.14668.89536.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Wed, 19 Mar 2014 23:30:14 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00584.txt.bz2 On Wednesday, March 19 2014, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > Hi, > > some parts of the former patch have been reimplemented in the meantime by > other patches so this is only a part of the former cleanup. Can't this go in independently? I think they are nice cleanups. Thanks, -- Sergio