From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-50103-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 12144 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2007 19:43:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 12104 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Aug 2007 19:43:43 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 19:43:41 +0000
Received: (qmail 4080 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2007 19:43:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (jimb@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 3 Aug 2007 19:43:39 -0000
To: Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, 	  Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc] [12/12] Get rid of current_gdbarch in remote.c
References: <46B31B38.50400@de.ibm.com>
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 19:43:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <46B31B38.50400@de.ibm.com> (Markus Deuling's message of "Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:10:32 +0200")
Message-ID: <m3odho2yl1.fsf@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00076.txt.bz2

Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com> writes:
> this patch gets rid of some of the current_gdbarch's in remote.c
>
> Is this ok to commit?

This looks okay to me.  Same comment about the ChangeLog entry as
before; either my or Eli's suggestion is fine with me.