From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13091 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2010 20:02:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 12894 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Feb 2010 20:02:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:02:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1JK2gC3005304 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:02:42 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1JK2fCt016725; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:02:42 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1JK2enT008539; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:02:41 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 7EF37378212; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:02:40 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: valgrind and the test suite, take 2 References: <201002191745.18600.pedro@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:02:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201002191745.18600.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:45:18 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00505.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> On Friday 19 February 2010 17:23:52, Tom Tromey wrote: >> This patch adds support for valgrind to the test suite. Unlike my last >> patch along these lines, this one adds value above just setting GDB. Pedro> Couldn't this be done with a board file? Maybe, but then it won't be in the tree, and it won't be documented. If that is an objection, could you explain why you'd prefer it to be done that way? The point of doing it this way is to encourage more frequent runs using valgrind. I find bugs with valgrind so often that I wish this mode of running were the default. Tom