From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11131 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2010 21:00:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 11119 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Apr 2010 21:00:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:00:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DKxvYx021766 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:59:58 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DKxvBp006178; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:59:57 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DKxu0D028784; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:59:56 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id E3E59378887; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:59:55 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Group errors for many missing shared libraries References: <201004121130.03196.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201004131114.57018.pedro@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201004131114.57018.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:14:56 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00429.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Tom> How about mentioning this in the message if there is more than one Tom> missing? Pedro> Good idea. Does this sound right? Looks good to me. Tom