From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 866 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2010 22:53:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 857 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Oct 2010 22:53:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:53:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o96MqxpZ010177 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 6 Oct 2010 18:52:59 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o96MqxgZ002136; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 18:53:00 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o96Mqvp5016416; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 18:52:57 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4D01E378893; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 16:52:57 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Hilfinger@adacore.com Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Extend hashed symbol dictionaries to work with Ada References: <201010050820.o958Kf42002588@syracuse.mckusick.com> Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:53:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Tom Tromey's message of "Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:43:32 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> This is ok with the "char *" spacing thing fixed. I think I was a little too hasty here. It would be better if Joel ok'd any ada-specific changes. While they seem reasonable to me, I don't think I know enough to really approve them. The other bits are fine, though. Tom